March 7, 2025 -- Workforce boards in communities all across this country strive every day to connect work opportunities and jobseekers. They help businesses – tens of thousands of small and medium sized companies that are our economy’s backbone – fill their talent needs, to the tune of over 1 million jobs filled every year. 

The House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development hearing held on Wednesday, March 5, Strengthening WIOA: Improving Outcomes for America’s Workforce, addressed such things as the economic costs of not connecting young people to education and/or work, the important role community colleges play in preparing workers for today’s economy, and the critical need for better data to support workforce development efforts. While these are all good aspects of the discussion to reauthorize the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the hearing did not explore all that workforce boards do to meet the needs of business and those trying to enter the labor market. 

Several committee members noted the impact their local workforce boards have on their district’s economy; Ranking Member Alma Adams (D-NC) noted specifically that last year NAWB member CharlotteWorks generated over $224 million in economic impact while serving more than 40,000 people. That’s quite a return on public investment – but what would happen if CharlotteWorks is mandated to spend 50% of its resources to provide a one-size-fits-all type of training, regardless of an individual jobseeker’s needs? 

That’s exactly what will happen if the previous Congress’s WIOA reauthorization proposal is introduced in its original form. The bill, A Stronger Workforce for America (ASWA), mandates local workforce boards spend 50% of their Adult and Dislocated Worker funds on training. 

While there was an allowance in the final, nearly enacted version of ASWA to permit including supportive services including childcare or transportation supports, and career services including case management or career coaching to comprise part of that mandated threshold, the provision restricts a local workforce board’s ability to determine the best overall use of these funds. 

ASWA proposes using a hammer when what’s needed is a multi-tool. Local boards need to be able to use any number of tools to bring talent and opportunity together – not just one mandated ‘go to’. 

Instead of CharlotteWorks being able to respond to local worker and business needs in the ways determined by their customers, they will be forced to either authorize training when it’s not really needed or deny services to jobseekers because they don’t need training. 

As I noted in a blog earlier this week, I am not aware of anyone involved in the workforce system that doesn’t support finding more ways for jobseekers to get the training and skills development they need to access opportunities. But if the end game here is to get more people trained, incentivize local boards to achieve that result as opposed to restricting their ability to fully serve their customers; consider leveraging other funds – public or private – to count toward a training goal; pass the bipartisan legislation that would open access to Pell Grant dollars for short-term training. 

1.5 million jobs are filled each year with support from our nation’s public workforce system; that’s a job filled every five seconds of every business day. Yes, WIOA reauthorization should be responsive to the important topics covered in the House Subcommittee hearing. But it also needs to add to the tools a workforce board uses to meet this moment, not limit them. 

- btl